Beneficiary of Fake DMCA:
- Li Haidong (director – BOUNTY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL LTD)
- Perjury, Impersonation, Identity-theft, Misrepresentation
Fake Link/Website Used:
Date of Submission:
- April 09, 2018
- February 17, 2018
ANALYZING THE FAKE DMCA
** Investigation in progress **
A small preface to our investigation. This is a particularly interesting case because a multi-millionaire has taken a great deal of risk to hide some information online. We wondered why, so we had a look.
The court order Li Hadoing tried to hide, was related to a lawsuit in which it was alleged that he defaulted on a business transaction of $6,000,000, in which he was a guarantor as well. The money simply vanished. Where could it go ?
Here’s an interesting relationship scheme – https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/nodes/77518
Another chart reveals more – https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/nodes/77518
It would be interesting to know all the facts once we conclude our investigation and provide our report to the Hon’ courts in Singapore.
Yes, that’s right. Our team and friends are currently investigating this fake DMCA incident and analyzing all the public data we have with us. Right now we have the evidence captured and archived, we are still waiting for a response from Li Haidong, Google and other related parties involved in this fake DMCA. This could take up to a couple of weeks.
However, make no mistake. This is indeed a case of copyright take-down fraud purported in order to hide online content. Once we compile all the facts of this case with due diligence, the final report will be published here.
We fight for the truth. If you have anything to contribute to this report or want to provide critical information against Li Haidong, you can get in touch with us at [email protected] We’re open for dialogue, unless your intention is to threaten us and waste your time.
SO WHAT WERE THEY TRYING TO HIDE ?
In particular, a negative review/story against Li Haidong which potentially hurt business and reputation. Here is an excerpt from that report –
Bounty Resources Armenia Ltd v Li Haidong
High Court — Suit No 1102 of 2014 (Registrar’s Appeal No 114 of 2015 and Summons No 2282 of 2015)
The present case concerns an appeal — Registrar’s Appeal No 114 of 2015 (“RA 114/2015”) — against the decision of an Assistant Registrar (“the AR”) in Summons No 578 of 2015 (“SUM 578/2015”) wherein the AR dismissed the application of the defendant, Li Haidong, to set aside a judgment granted in default of his appearance in the present suit (“the Default Judgment”).
WHAT IS A FAKE DMCA AND WHY ARE WE LISTED HERE ?
Soon after we published the first set of our investigation reports on fake DMCAs, we managed to generate interest from online media such as Techdirt, Adweek and Huffington Post. Some of the key stories included our revelations on Sukanto Tanoto, Idea Buyer, Qnet , Tai Lopez ,Amira Nature Food, Beachside Recovery and more. We also shared unpublished data and information with 3 different law agencies who looked into this scam.
And we got results. We dented this fake DMCA industry and made sure we act as deterrent to the rogue reputation firms indulged in these criminal practices. Here are some of the outcomes and changes we made possible with the help of several other citizen lawyers and agencies –
- Ripoff Report wipes out Google (fake) Removals with a stroke of genius ! Thank you Ed – at webactivism.com
- Court finds evidence of ‘fraud on the Court’ in one of the missing-defendant libel takedown cases – at washingtonpost.com
- Default judgment aimed at deindexing apparently accurate information about person convicted of sex offense – at washingtonpost.com
- Panic and desperation getting the better of rogue reputation services – at webactivism.com
- Google still deindexing some material found by courts to be defamatory — but it’s being more skeptical – at washingtonpost.com
- Google Apparently No Longer Humoring Court Orders To Delist Defamatory Content – at techdirt.com
- Paul Levy Discovers Head Of Reputation Management Company Signed Off On Forged/Fraudulent Court Docs – at techdirt.com
- Filing Bogus Lawsuits As Part Of A ‘Reputation Management’ Strategy Costs Firm $71,000 – at techdirt.com
- Richart Ruddie Settles anti-SLAPP Claims, Makes Restitution; but the Guilty Companies Remain Unpunished – at typepad.com
- Who Filed Fake Copyright Infringement Complaints Against AgencySpy? – at adweek.com
- The Dark Art of Fake DMCA Takedown Requests – at huffingtonpost.com
Fake Fraudulent DMCA might seem inconspicuous, until it’s you at the receiving end of this crime. This is not a prank. This is not an inconvenience. This is not random. These fake DMCA cases are calculated criminal schemes targeting very specific and rather important information/content. These hitjobs are usually against media, in order to help their client hide important information from public’s eye, all in the name of Reputation Management. Millions of dollars are spent doing this, and if no one wants to bring this topic to the fore, we will.
Our team will not constantly monitor and publish these reports on a DAILY basis without fail. And we do not plan to publish and forget. We will take constructive steps in order to expose the faces behind this scam, and to try and undo the damages. AND IF YOU INDEED PART OF THIS SCAM, WE WILL ENSURE THAT YOU GET WHAT’S COMING YOUR WAY.