Beneficiary of Fake DMCA:
- Perjury, Impersonation, Identity-theft, Misrepresentation
Fake Link/Website Used:
Date of Submission:
ANALYZING THE FAKE DMCA
This one takes the cake. The perpetrators tried to file a copyright notice against a public document. There can be no copyright on public documents, especially a court order.
Anyways, let’s analyze. The sender of this DMCA is none other than ‘CNN NEWS’. Now, of course CNN is not going to run a free blog at http://cnn-worldsnews.blogspot.ca . And they certainly are not going to file a copyright notice for a public/legal document.
So, apart from fake DMCA and perjury, there is impersonation involved as well.
Of course, the planted article link – http://cnn-worldsnews.blogspot.ca/2017/11/documents-prove-fraud-in-summary_7.html does NOT work after we contacted them for information.
SO WHAT WERE THEY TRYING TO HIDE ?
The beneficiary of this fake DMCA, Strathcona Construction, had an unflattering judgement in a case of fraud explained at the famous legal database – Lexology.com. The article was published by Baker McKenzie at https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5c5a253d-616b-4278-8015-cf81be65eb4e.
Here are some of the excerpts from this article –
Summary judgment of an action may only be granted when there is no genuine issue requiring a trial and this can be difficult to prove in fraud cases where credibility is often an important factor. In the recent Ontario Superior Court decision in MacNamara v. 2087850 Ontario Ltd. (Strathcona Construction), 2017 ONSC 499, Justice Akbarali granted summary judgment finding both fraud and grounds to pierce the corporate veil of a corporate defendant. This case demonstrates how liability for even the most serious causes of action can be established by way of summary judgment where a full evidentiary record allows the Court to find the necessary facts, apply the law, and determine that there is no genuine issue for trial.
If this was us, even we’d want this to be gone.
EDITOR’S COMMENT : For those who might ask – ‘why and how do we interject that ‘Strathcona Construction’ has something to do with this fake DMCA. Couldn’t it be a coincidence ?’, we will say this – When someone goes and creates a whole new fake news site, falsifies his/her identity and submits fake DMCA to try and de-list some very targeted content on Google, it signals intent and a plan. It is obvious that ‘Strathcona Construction’ or someone they hired was directly involved in this crime. Strathcona Construction also cannot plead ignorance in this matter, since this notice on Google search is hard to miss, really.