Beneficiary of Forged Court Order:   

  • Sukanto Tanoto

Contact Info:   

Possible Infringements:   

  • Perjury, Impersonation, Identity-theft, Misrepresentation

Forged Court Order Used:   

Date of Submission:   

  • July 14, 2016
  • September 13, 2016
  • July 08, 2016

Sukanto Tanoto is based out of Indonesia, with little to no presence in the USA. However, the person operating the websites where the target content was published, is located in USA. She’s none other than Sukanto Tanoto’s own estranged niece.

There was no legal foundations for any sort of lawsuit since most of the content was her own personal opinion, and facts backed with evidence. Also, Sukanto Tanoto would never be stupid enough to indulge in a lengthy and messy lawsuit against his own family member since he had a lot to lose. So he did what most billionaires would do. He instructed his staff to ‘get rid of these negative links’ and do ‘whatever it takes’ to deliver results.

The staff reached out to  The famous ‘Robert Ruddie‘ whom we busted many years ago. Here is an idea of who Sukanto Tanoto hired to do his biding –

Even a $71,000 lawsuit wasn’t going to deter Rubert Ruddie from forging a court order and submitting it to Google.

In spite of some terrific Photoshop job, this is what they finally submitted –


Sukanto Tanoto Fake Court Order


Fake Court Order - Sukanto Tanoto


Sukanto Tanoto Forgery



Some key aspects of this forgery are –

  • There is no one by the name Sukanto Talson who lives at 2300 Walnut Street, PA 19103
  • The website is owned by Wendy Tanoto. However, the fake court order is against someone named Noemi Martinez.
  • No one by that name lives at the address provided – 103 Ave De Diego Gallery Plaza, San Juan PR 00911.
  • The fact that these idiots attempted to forge a sitting judge’s signature, makes them liable for criminal prosecution


Unlike our previous reports, we’re not going to sit idle on this one. We are not finished with this investigation. In spite of several threats and attempts to take us offline, we’re still here. Now’s the time to give it back as good as we got from these rogue agencies.

So, here’s what’s going to happen.  We have discovered this Forged Court Order and have verified it to be so. Hence this article. The following stages will include –

  • manually informing all relevant parties involved in this, including Google, Sukanto Tanoto, the beneficiary
  • forwarding the information to Lumen Database and selected media organizations who are interested in these cases
  • publishing the negative content (they tried to remove) on multiple free-speech platforms such as, etc so that copies of the content are available for eternity, and the purpose of this fake DMCA lost forever
  • continue investigating this case to find out which of the actors are involved, including any reputation or law firm, and if/when found, we’ll make sure everyone knows who is behind these illegal activities
  • set up Google ads to name and shame these so-called beneficiaries of these scams
  • and most importantly, we’ll forward our findings to all relevant law enforcement agencies in the jurisdiction of the beneficiary


If you think Webactivism was effective before, you’ll be amazed at what we have in store of all these scammers this time. Over the past few months, there has been a steady campaign against Webactivism with allegation and lies spread on dozens of free spammy blogs. They claim that Webactivism works with reputation agencies and extort money to remove articles. So, if you are listed on webactivism this time, you can thank these idiots. If you need to inquire our removal policy, just email us. We can put you through to actual victims we have helped. Also, if you are one of the reputation firm claiming that you can remove content from our website, we openly dare you to try. Go ahead….


Finally, if you are one of the critics of Sukanto Tanoto or have information about the reputation/law firm involved, or just want to post your thoughts and opinion, feel free to post a comment below. If there is one place from where he cannot remove any content, it is here.


Sukanto Tanoto is an Indonesian businessman involved primarily in the lumber industry. As of 2013 he was considered to be one of Indonesia’s wealthiest individuals with a net worth of US$ 2.3 billion. After starting as a supplier of equipment and materials for the state-owned oil firm Pertamina, Tanoto moved into the forest industry in 1973. Tanoto’s business interests are represented by the Royal Golden Eagle (RGE) group of companies (previously known as Raja Garuda Mas). Here is an excerpt from that report –

My name is Wendy Tanoto, the daughter of Polar Yanto Tanoto, and the niece of Sukanto Tanoto.

Polar Yanto Tanoto is the Director of Asia Pacific Resources International Holdings Ltd. He partnered with Sukanto Tanoto and built the RGE empire since the 1970s.

After my father passed away in an air crash in Sep 26 1997, Sukanto took a series of actions to pressure our family into giving up our father’s assets and block all information regarding the assets from us.

Until today, Sukanto Tanoto has not returned Polar’s assets to my family and utilize them as his own.

I’m here to share the story of how a powerful man used his power to get away with his wrong doings and the journey of my family fighting for justice.

Read the full article at –


In case you are one of the ‘beneficiaries’  listed in this report and are wondering what really happened, we suggest you look within. If it wasn’t you, or your associates, it is definitely the ‘Reputation’ or ‘SEO’ firm you had hired in the past. Perhaps it was your law firm. So, instead of blaming us for this article, you must grill your Reputation/SEO firm and look for answers. We are merely publishing the facts available on public database and have nothing against you personally. It is more than likely that the service you hired indulged in criminal methods to deliver results for you.

Meanwhile, we are awaiting more information from Sukanto Tanoto and Google to ascertain who was behind this fake DMCA. We’ll update this page once we have more information. If you have any information to add to this investigation, get in touch with us at [email protected]

We are also investigating similar or related incidents of fraudulent DMCAs and forged court orders as mentioned in our reports at –

If in case we discover more information on this case, we’ll update the article. If you have any information to add, please submit a new comment below.

Soon after we published the first set of our investigation reports on fake DMCAs, we managed to generate interest from online media such as Techdirt, Adweek and Huffington Post. Some of the key stories included our revelations on Sukanto Tanoto, Idea BuyerQnet , Tai Lopez ,Amira Nature Food, Beachside Recovery and more. We also shared unpublished data and information with 3 different law agencies who looked into this scam.

And we got results. We dented this fake DMCA industry and made sure we act as deterrent to the rogue reputation firms indulged in these criminal practices. Here are some of the outcomes and changes we made possible with the help of several other citizen lawyers and agencies –

Fake Fraudulent Court Orders may seem inconspicuous, until it’s you at the receiving end of this crime. This is not a prank. This is not an inconvenience. This is not random. These fake DMCA cases are calculated criminal schemes targeting very specific and rather important information/content. These hitjobs are usually against media, in order to help their client hide important information from public’s eye, all in the name of Reputation Management. Millions of dollars are spent doing this, and if no one wants to bring this topic to the fore, we will.

Our team will not constantly monitor and publish these reports on a DAILY basis without fail. And we do not plan to publish and forget. We will take constructive steps in order to expose the faces behind this scam, and to try and undo the damages. AND IF YOU INDEED PART OF THIS SCAM, WE WILL ENSURE THAT YOU GET WHAT’S COMING YOUR WAY. 

This complaint and/or review was posted on on Dec 01, 2018 and is a permanent record located here: . 

Furthermore, has an exclusive license to Sukanto Tanoto investigation. It may not be copied without the written permission of This investigation on Sukanto Tanoto is submitted and written by one of our members. Any and all opinions and information are published as is. We do not edit or remove any aspect of the report and is merely a free-speech platform.

As such, we cannot be held liable for the investigation reports and articles posted about Sukanto Tanoto.